The Trump administration has backed off its original plan to impose steep entrance fee increases at 17 national parks during peak visiting season, opting for more moderate increases at all the park sites that collect fees. Here’s what the plan will cost visitors and where those fees will go.
Last October, the Trump administration proposed massive fee hikes to take effect during peak season this year, in some cases recommending that the National Park Service nearly triple the current entrance fees at 17 of the most popular parks in the country. In response, the public inundated the Department of the Interior with nearly 110,000 comments, including 20,000 comments from NPCA supporters. A whopping 98 percent of these comments opposed the increases, according to NPCA’s estimate.
A historic park funding bill will dedicate $6.5 billion over five years to priority projects in the National Park Service’s nearly $12 billion backlog of needed repair work.See more ›
Now, the administration has revised its proposal and announced that it will yield to public opinion and enact more moderate increases. NPCA commends the administration for abandoning its initial proposal. We urge the Department of the Interior to do the research that has not yet been done to determine the price at which fee increases would discourage visitation. Fees can help supplement federal funds but shouldn’t be done in a way that prices people out of their parks.
Here is a short summary of the new fee plan and what it will mean for visitors and parks.
Q: How much will fees at individual parks increase?
At parks that charge entrance fees, these fees will increase by a much more reasonable amount than the initial proposal, in most cases a total of $5. A complete list of increases by park can be found on the Park Service website. Parks that do not currently charge entrance fees will remain free.
Q: How many parks currently charge entrance fees?
Currently, 117 of the 417 national park sites collect entrance fees.
Q: Will the cost of annual passes and senior passes increase?
The cost of the America the Beautiful annual pass will not increase. This pass grants access for one calendar year to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites that charge fees. This includes all national park sites as well as lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other agencies.
The cost of the senior pass will also not increase in 2018. In 2017, the Interior Department raised the cost of this pass from $10 to $80, a move NPCA supported. Once purchased, the pass lasts for a lifetime.
Q: When will these fee increases take effect?
The increases will be phased in between June 2018 and January 2020. For a complete schedule of increases by park, see the Park Service website.
Q: Where does my money go when I pay national park fees?
National parks retain 80 percent of the money they collect from entrance and recreation fees at the site where the fees are collected; the remaining 20 percent is distributed to other national parks that collect little or no money from fees. In a few cases, national parks that collect less than half a million dollars annually can keep all of the fees they collect. In recent years, regulations have stipulated that at least 55 percent of the revenue at fee-collecting parks must go toward repair projects that have been delayed due to underfunding.
Q: What do these fees actually pay for?
Currently, entrance and recreation fees are collected for the sole purpose of enhancing visitor experiences by improving park facilities and providing additional services. Fees do not pay for park operations. Fees may be used to repair and improve facilities, restore wildlife habitat, fund law enforcement personnel, provide educational programs, and assist with other such needs.
Specific examples of projects funded by entrance and recreation fees include enhanced audio and visual features at visitor centers at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, free shuttle buses at Zion National Park, and a new 440-foot accessible walkway to the presidential grave site at the Herbert Hoover National Historic Site.
Q: NPCA has supported fee increases in recent years. Why didn’t NPCA support the administration’s original October 2017 proposal to increase fees at the 17 most-visited parks?
NPCA continues to support moderate fee increases, but the Interior Department should not raise entrance fees so steeply, without clear reasoning, making national park sites unaffordable for some families to visit. This disenfranchises people from visiting places that are protected for the benefit of the public and has the potential to harm vibrant tourism-based economies that depend on national parks for jobs and visitor spending.
Q: Will this fee increase address the $11.6 billion National Park Service backlog and other national park funding needs?
Stay On Top of News
Our email newsletter shares the latest on parks.
While fees play a role in generating revenue for national park projects, it is the responsibility of Congress to fund their operations and preservation needs, and fees can never play more than a small role in funding parks if they are to remain affordable.
The Park Service estimates that it will raise an additional $60 million per year from this fee increase, which amounts to less than 1 percent of the entire backlog, and a very small portion of the annual shortfall in park operations for rangers and other pressing needs. To meet the scope of park funding needs, Congress has to step up and appropriate more funding for these critical park needs each year. Further, lawmakers must agree to work with the administration and pass legislation like the National Park Service Legacy Act, which would dedicate more than $11 billion to the repair backlog over 30 years.
About the author
John Garder Senior Director of Budget & Appropriations, Government Affairs
John Garder is Senior Director of Budget & Appropriations at NPCA. He is a budget analyst and researcher who advocates for more adequate funding for national parks to diverse audiences, including Congress, the White House, and the Department of the Interior.